IC Markets vs FP Markets
Select two brokers to compare them using the same information and scoring categories found in our individual reviews. Brokers are listed alphabetically; the comparison does not indicate a recommendation.
Comparison
This comparison is provided for general information and does not constitute an endorsement, investment advice or a recommendation to open an account. Verify all details through official sources before making any decision.
| Criterion | ||
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | Editorial score 3.8 out of 5 Out of 5 |
Editorial score 3.9 out of 5 Out of 5 |
| Scores by category | ||
| Regulation and transparency (29%) | 4.0 / 5 | 3.0 / 5 |
| Costs and fee disclosure (23%) | 4.0 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Risk and consumer information (18%) | 2.5 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Customer support (12%) | 5.0 / 5 | 5.0 / 5 |
| Education and research (12%) | 4.0 / 5 | 5.0 / 5 |
| Website and user experience (6%) | 3.1 / 5 | 5.0 / 5 |
| Regulation and markets | ||
| Main regulation | ASIC AFSL 335692, CySEC 362/18, FSA Seychelles SD018 | ASIC AFSL 286354, CySEC 371/18, CMA Kenya 193 |
| Entities by region |
|
|
| Markets offered | Currencies, Indices, Commodities, Share CFDs, ETFs, Crypto, Bonds | Currencies, Indices, Commodities, Share CFDs, ETFs, Crypto, Bonds |
| Review details | ||
| Publisher relationship | None disclosed | None disclosed |
| Last reviewed | 1 July 2026 | 1 July 2026 |
| Full review | Read IC Markets Review | Read FP Markets Review |
Popular comparisons
How this comparison works
Every broker is assessed using the same documented criteria. Scores are based on publicly available information, direct product research and clearly identified sources. Read the methodology →
A note on risk
CFDs and other leveraged products carry a high risk of losing money rapidly because of leverage, and a majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. A high editorial score reflects disclosure and service quality. It does not make trading safe.